?

Log in

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009, 08:53 am
A True Rule

There are important rules about what to do if three people are socializing together and two of them are "a couple." They just mess me up every time for some reason, and I feel there is no way to negotiate them gracefully AT ALL.

First, if you are in a restaurant or some place where you have to sit down, you have to make sure the couple sits together and the third person sits across from them. Those are just the rules, and if you mess this up, it will ALWAYS be awkward, and people will NEVER accept it--something I've learned from years of personal experience on both sides of this tense situation.

Restaurant seating arrangements used to be my worst enemy when it came to "the couples crisis," but lately I've started to feel that places like the subway or theater, where you have to sit three in a row, are even trickier. You'd think three-in-row situations would be easy because they have an obvious "egalitarian" solution: the member of the couple who knows the third person best sits in the middle, duh. BUT, this only works well when it's very clear which member of the couple knows the third person best. Otherwise, it's a mess: as a member of the couple you have to make uncomfortable assumptions about the third person and which of you he or she would rather sit next to; as the third person, you are forced to pick sides.

Do you sit next to the member of the sex you're attracted to? Do you pointedly avoid sitting next to the member of the sex you're attracted to? What if you just want to sit next to the person you've known longer, but it's interpreted as you trying to "steal" the person? Or what if you actually just like one of the people better, not even in a sexual way--surely it is impolite to express this preference openly? Or maybe not? What about if you are gay and the couple is straight, do you just automatically sit next to the same-sex person anyway? Does this perpetuate "heterosexism" and just plain sexism in the world somehow, assuming that men cannot be friends with women, etc?

In short, three-in-a-row situations require some in-depth strategy (for example, I always try to make sure I am lined up in an inoffensive way right as I enter a theater, as if I'm just going to plop down "wherever," and I've learned to stand up in subways). Yet, I thought I had mastered restaurants up until today.

Like an autistic person who has memorized different facial expressions (so I have read), whenever I've been in a couple+1 restaurant situation lately, in any capacity, I have always been the first person to sit down, amazed by my social facility, proud of my mastery--earned through bitter experience--of the simple rule of "the couple sits together and the third person sits across." Yet, today, I was in a restaurant with a couple and I liked both people (while knowing the male individual somewhat better). And then, the female individual completely messed me up by proceeding to just sit down across from her romantic partner instead of next to him!!! I didn't know what to do! I only had a few seconds to make a decision.

I wasn't thinking very clearly, and I made the wrong decision. If the rule of "the couple must sit together" is broken, then the rule is "two people of the same sex must always sit together across from the person of a different sex," no matter what. That is a true rule.

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009 03:36 pm (UTC)
wynand

Someone needs to write a new Emily Post guide!

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009 04:00 pm (UTC)
miraclejones

All my male friends are fucking 7 foot forty with all kinds of elbows. I'd always rather give them their own side, if I can help it. Also, I like to sit facing the door, or the nearest threat.

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009 09:21 pm (UTC)
donferdinand

Hah, but isn't every male's nearest threat in this situation THE WOMAN

Tue, Jul. 14th, 2009 03:15 am (UTC)
megatexas

THE WOMAN??!?!? WHERE?

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009 04:22 pm (UTC)
tyrsalvia

I only have these sorts of issues when sitting with someone I am attracted to but not involved with. Particularly, when I am with my partner and someone either I am crushing on, or someone we both are crushing on. I don't want to "hog" the desired person, or seem to be disloyal to my partner.

Sometimes this is made even more difficult (in row seating) by the presence of my partner's other gf. If it's me, him, her, and someone he and I are crushing on... that's awkward. Normally when it's my partner and his other gf and I, he sits in the middle at movies and that's easy. But if both he and I are attracted to someone else there, then that means Crush sits next to me because otherwise Partner's SO wouldn't get to sit next to her bf. But then I feel like I am "staking a claim" on Crush in a way I don't want to, and....

Anyways, yeah, I know what you're talking about.

Mon, Jul. 13th, 2009 09:41 pm (UTC)
donferdinand

Yeah, that seems awkward, especially if "crush" doesn't know "partner's other girlfriend," so that it would seem cruel to make him or her sit way over next to the person they don't know, as if you're explicitly telling them that you value your relationship more than their happiness.

But, if your partner is there with two girlfriends, wouldn't it be "your prerogative" to sit next to the crush, so that you would both be sitting next to two "significant others"? It seems like the most awkward thing in that situation would be arranging it explicitly - like you are doing the whole party a favor by preparing beforehand so that everyone's arrangement seems casual when it is actually very deliberate!

Tue, Jul. 14th, 2009 08:48 am (UTC)
megatexas

Just learn to enjoy awkwardness in all its wonderful forms.

Tue, Jul. 14th, 2009 09:17 am (UTC)
heron61

I've only seen this rule be true for new or potential relationships - in the case of established couples, things seem far more free-form, with table dynamics being governed far more by convenience or circumstance than my any sorts of rigid laws of conduct. However, it's pretty universally true for new (less than 1-2 years old) relationships or in cases where one or both individuals are considering or hoping for a relatioship.

Wed, Jul. 15th, 2009 03:05 pm (UTC)
agabrielrose

I'm usually so focused on the Korn song running through my head that I don't notice where everyone is sitting. This indicates that all the sexual politics involved in your analysis are irrelevant to me.

When I do notice it's because whenever I am one of a pair facing a unit I try to collude with my booth-partner to subject the unit to a "firing squad" barrage of questions and hostile accusations.

Thu, Jul. 16th, 2009 02:19 pm (UTC)
chris_ycrtft

solution: only go to restaurants with round tables.

Tue, Jul. 21st, 2009 05:34 am (UTC)
conculcate

I enjoyed this almost as much as I enjoy the awkwardness of which you speak. Humans and their amusing insecurities...